Get over it: Dodd admitted on CNN that he knew about the bonuses so its not any sort of 'advantage' of the Dems...just a distraction from Obama's policies that his teleprompter has created.
Anyway, its less than one tenth of one percent of the money they were given...earmarks make up 2% of the total spending by Obama's admin...so why are the AIG 165million in bonuses significant and the 2% of Congress' insignificant???
Idiot libs.
Posts
2 comments:
Seems odd that you refer to "idiot libs" considering there have been a number of Republicans have been more outraged at the AIG bonuses using it as a reason to call for the failure of the entire programs. In fact if you have watched any news, any interviews of Republican congress members I think you would see that they are the ones with the pitchforks.
Republicans who have bitched include: Sen. James Inhofe, Sen. Charles Grassley, Sen. Richard Shelby, ranking Republican on the Banking Committee, Michael Steele who is the chair of the RNC, and more.
Objectivity isnt really a goal of yours is it?
Republicans are only outraged because it was Dodd that put them in the bailout bill lol
Oh, and objectivity is subjective. Is the 'news' objective? You also leave out that it was Obama that instructed his followers to harass private citizens.
Further, a 'bill of attainder' is wrong: they targeted the AIG executives for getting paid...that's wrong.
Post a Comment