I'm not ripping on my fellow members of the Conservative movement, I just would like to express an opposing method of reaching the same result. I think that traditional Christian Conservatism is wholly right, but that the yearning for values that have existed 'before' is wrong. We needn't look to the past to see what to work for; instead, look to faith.
Our faith tells us that He will protect us. God has blessed this country: I think we can all agree upon that. As we progress into the future, does our faith not tell us that 'moralism' will be the end result of all progress? I believe it does.
When you think of "progress," liberals and their religion, Liberalism, probably come to mind. They think that Progressivism (the embracing of their idea of progess) is the 'ditching' of all traditional morality: that this view of morality is parochial and dead and that 'new' moral relativism will come forth. They are dead wrong.
Liberals depend on "educated" scientists to prove their amoralistic points; this isn't happening anymore. RAW SCIENTIFIC FACT proves our case. I'm not talking about the modified, 'global warming' science they adhere to. I'm talking about the facts:
Wikipedia defines life as this:
(you really only have to read the bold parts)
- Homeostasis: Regulation of the internal environment to maintain a constant state; for example, sweating to reduce temperature.
- Organization: being composed of one or more cells
- Metabolism: : Consumption of energy by converting nonliving material into cellular components (anabolism) and decomposing organic matter (catabolism). Living things require energy to maintain internal organization (homeostasis) and to produce the other phenomena associated with life.
- Growth: Maintenance of a higher rate of synthesis than catalysis. A growing organism increases in size in all of its parts, rather than simply accumulating matter. The particular species begins to multiply and expand as the evolution continues to flourish.
- Adaptation: The ability to change over a period of time in response to the environment. This ability is fundamental to the process of eevolution and is determined by the organism's heredity as well as the composition of metabolized substances, and external factors present.
- Response to Stimuli: A response can take many forms, from the contraction of a unicellular organism when touched to complex reactions involving all the senses of higher animals. A response is often expressed by motion, for example, the leaves of a plant turning toward the sun or an animal chasing its prey.
- Reproduction: The ability to produce new organisms. Reproduction can be the division of one cell to form two new cells. Usually the term is applied to the production of a new individual (either asexually, from a single parent organism, or sexually, from at least two differing parent organisms), although strictly speaking it also describes the production of new cells in the process of growth.
I'll try to keep my responses short...
- Homeostasis: An endangered lizard in South America dips its tail into water to cool itself off...the unborn relies on his or her mother for warm...kangaroos do also...out of the womb...it's illegal to kill both animals...but not an unborn baby.
- Organization: Well that's quite obvious...
- Metabolism: The placenta feeds the baby just like we rely on plants and animals while we're walking and talking.
- Growth: The 'Stages of Growth' imply that this exists.
- Adaptation: Stuff that's internalized...like alchohal or tobacco smoke...effect the way the baby grows. Brain probelms and likely alcohalism result from the mother's alcohal comsumption while athsema or cystic fibrosis result from tobacco comsumption.
- Response to Stimuli: A baby in the zygote state will find the best spot to position itself on the womb's wall, in the embryo state he or she tries to stay 'upright', and a fetus will protect his or her face from a twin's kicks using their hands and forearms.
- Reproduction: An unborn child may not fulfill the basic requirements of making a new organism, but reproducing cells is basic to the growth: this cannot be denied.
The anti-life people believe in the scientific method and they openly admit it...shouldnt they really get their facts, values, and principles correct before they go pandering to the promiscuous vote...
It just all upholds the position that Liberals and Dems have absolutly no core principles...bright bold colors....our colors are...ummm...red, white, and blue while their's are faded, soggy, and sickly shades of green and pinko-red....
I'm sorry if that last part didnt make much sense...it does to me and it's late.
No comments:
Post a Comment